Novedades sobre la jurisdicción competente en los contratos internacionales de transporte aéreo de pasajeros –Reglamento Bruselas I-BIS y Convenio de Montreal–
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolLos contratos internacionales de transporte de pasajeros no se incluyen en el ambito de aplicacion de las normas de Derecho internacional privado protectoras de los consumidores, por lo que no le son de aplicacion los foros recogidos en el art. 17.3 del Reglamento Bruselas I-bis. El contrato de transporte internacional de pasajeros espanoles llevado a cabo por la empresa irlandesa Ryanair establece entre sus condiciones generales que los Tribunales competentes son los irlandeses. Los tribunales espanoles en la STSJ Madrid CA de 30 octubre 2013, Sentencia JM Valencia 16 febrero 2017, SAP Madrid 26 julio 2017 han tenido que pronunciarse sobre la validez de esa clausula de eleccion de tribunal. EnglishInternational contracts of transport of passengers are not included in the scope of application of the rules of private international law protecting consumers, so that the Jurisdiction over consumer contracts in art. 17.3 of the Brussels I-bis Regulation is not apply to a contract of transport. The contract of international transport of Spanish passengers carried out by the Irish company Ryanair establishes among its general conditions an agreement conferring jurisdiction to the Irish Court. The Spanish courts in the STSJ Madrid CA of October 30, 2013, Judgment JM Valencia February 16, 2017, SAP Madrid July 26, 2017 have had to pronounce on the validity of that agreement conferring jurisdiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".