Duration of Dermatitis before Patch Test Appointment is Associated with Distance to Clinic and County Poverty Rate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contact dermatitis is a common disease that is associated with impaired quality of life. OBJECTIVE: We examined the effect of travel distance and other socioeconomic factors on duration of dermatitis before presentation at the Duke Contact Dermatitis and Patch Testing Center. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent patch testing from March 1, 2012, to August 1, 2018. Associations between duration of dermatitis, distance to clinic, and socioeconomic factors (age, race, payor group, county poverty rate, rural-urban status) were examined. RESULTS: The median duration of dermatitis was 14 months (Q1 = 7 months; Q3 = 36 months), and the median distance to clinic was 18 miles (Q1 = 7 miles; Q3 = 45.9 miles). For a 50-mile increase in the distance from the patient's zip code to the clinic, the median duration of dermatitis increased by 17.9% (P < 0.001). For every 5% increase in the county poverty rate, the median duration of dermatitis increased by 16.3% (n = 29; P = 0.032). Trends were noted for a longer duration of dermatitis based on insurance payor, rural-urban status, and race. CONCLUSIONS: Distance to patch test provider and county poverty status are important measures of access for patients with dermatitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".