MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3013875217 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2019-0235

Fragmentation dynamics in an <i>Abies religiosa</i> forest of central Mexico

2020· article· en· W3013875217 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Laura E. Montoya, Remigio A. Guzmán-Plazola, Lauro López–Mata

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicForest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbies albaForestryPicea abiesGeographyFragmentation (computing)BorealLand coverHabitatEcologyPhysical geographyLand useBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fir (Abies Mill.) forests of Mexico are relicts of the boreal forests that advanced southwards during glaciation periods. Mexico is a center of diversification of the Abies genus, as there are eight species in its territory, six of which are endemic. The forests of Abies religiosa (Kunth) Schltdl. & Cham. near Mexico City are subject to a process of deterioration. We analyzed the fragmentation dynamics of the A. religiosa forest in the northern region of the Sierra Nevada, Mexico. Land cover change detection was done by means of high-resolution images acquired by the SPOT satellite in 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2018. Habitat fragmentation was observed, with a decrease in the size of dense Abies masses. The area covered by Abies decreased by 22.9%. The area occupied by forest openings increased 3% from 2005 to 2010 and then decreased by 1.8% and 1.6% in the following periods. The land patch type Other Forest Cover increased in both frequency and size, with the area increasing by 23.3%, which warns of a change process towards this patch type. The formation of increasingly smaller and isolated remnants of A. religiosa forest in the Sierra Nevada can lead to the loss of this vegetation relict and its replacement by other types of cover in the short term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicForest Ecology and Biodiversity StudiesFrench-language works237,207