MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3013907891 · doi:10.1101/2020.03.27.012724

Evidence of Presence and Activation of the two Cell Cycle Kinases Nek6 and Nek7 in the ciliated Neuroretina

2020· preprint· en· W3013907891 on OpenAlexaff
K Janisch, J. M. Kasanuki, Richard J. Davis, Stephen H. Tsang

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsColumbia College
FundersInstitute for Research in Biomedicine
KeywordsCell biologyCiliumKinasePhosphorylationVisual phototransductionBiologyBiogenesisSerineChemistryRetinaBiochemistryNeuroscienceGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The serine/threonine NIMA kinases are widely found in eukaryotes. They are cell-cycle kinases that are associated with centrosomes and spindle apparatus and cilia. In cilia, NIMA kinases are reported to play a role in cilia length maintenance and deflagelation. Here we focus on the two Nek homologs, Nek6 and Nek7, and their potential role in retina. We report for the first-time expression of nek6 and nek7 mRNA and protein in retinal tissue. In particular, we detect localisation of these kinases to photoreceptors outer segments. Moreover, we are able to show a light-dependent phosphorylation of the activation loop (serine 206) of Nek6/7 in rod outer segments, suggesting activation of these kinases is downstream of the phototransduction pathway. Indeed, we demonstrate that Nek6/7 phosphorylation in the retina is dependent on Grk1 function. Furthermore, Nek6/7 phosphorylation can be stimulated in the brain by opiate drugs, suggesting that activation of Nek6/7 lies downstream of G protein coupled receptors activation, in general. Nek6/7 may couple photoreception with outer segment biogenesis through phosphorylation of downstream substrates, which may affect the microtubules of the axoneme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→