MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014024536 · doi:10.5430/ijfr.v11n2p436

Applicability of Forensic Accounting to Reduce Fraud and its Effects on Financial Statement of Jordanian Shareholding Companies From the Perspective of Judiciary and Certified Public Accountant

2020· article· en· W3014024536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdussalam Mahmoud Abu‐Tapanjeh, Ashwaq Rateb AlTarawneh

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIslamic Finance and Banking Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAccountingForensic accountingCertificationBusinessAuditFinancial statementSample (material)External auditorDescriptive statisticsTest (biology)Order (exchange)Public interestPublic relationsFinancePolitical scienceLawInternal audit

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aimed to investigate the applicability of forensic accounting to reduce fraud and its effects on financial statement of Jordanian Shareholding Companies from the perspective of Judiciary and Certified Public Accountant. This study used the descriptive analytical method. In order to elicit data from the participants, the researcher used a questionnaire survey distributed over a randomly selected sample from competent authorities in the financial criminal cases in the Jordanian Courts (Judges, Public Prosecutors), Certified Public Accountants licensed to practice auditing, and chartered accountants with expertise in financial cases in the Jordanian courts, to investigate their perceptions and views about the applicability of Forensic Accounting to reducefraud and its effects on financial statement of Jordanian Shareholding Companies. The researcher used the statistical analysis program (SPSS) to analyze the collected data in addition of the regression equation test, the statistical differences test for the non-scientific samples.The findings of the study showed that there is a necessity for providing the requirements, components, procedures and activities of Forensic Accounting in Jordan to reduce fraud and its effects on financial statement of Jordanian Shareholding Companies from the perspective of Judiciary and Certified Public Accountant. Also, the results of the study indicated that there is a difference between the judicial authority and Certified Public Accountants perceptions. Based on these findings, the study lists a set of recommendations the most important of which is adopt the requirements and principles of applying Forensic Accounting by decision-makers and professional organizations, and to establish an official and independent professional association of Forensic Accountants to develop forensic accounting standards and legislation, and to raise the awareness of the judicial authorities concerning the importance of the concept of Forensic Accounting in resolving financial criminal cases, and the extent of its contribution in rationalizing judicial decisions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.609

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Financial ResearchSame topicIslamic Finance and Banking StudiesFrench-language works237,207