MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3014058489 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.6243

The association between patient body mass index and perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy: An analysis using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database

2019· article· en· W3014058489 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Matthew Lenardis, Benjamin T. Harper, Raj Satkunasivam, Zachary Klaassen, Christopher J.D. Wallis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystectomyMedicinePerioperativeBody mass indexBladder cancerOdds ratioConfidence intervalComplicationSurgeryDatabaseCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Radical cystectomy is a highly morbid procedure with 30-day perioperative complication rates approaching 50%. Our objective was to determine the effect of patients’ body mass index (BMI) on perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Methods: We identified 3930 eligible patients who underwent radical cystectomy for nonmetastatic bladder cancer using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. The primary exposure was preoperative BMI, categorically operationalized in four strata according to the World Health Organization criteria: <18.5 kg/m2, 18.5–25 kg/m2, 25–30 kg/m2, and >30 kg/m2. Our primary outcome was major perioperative complication comprising mortality, reoperation, cardiac event, or neurological event. Results: BMI was significantly associated with rates of major complications (p=0.003): major complications were experienced by 17.0% of patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m2, 7.8% of patients with BMI 18.5–25 kg/m2, 7.9% of patients with BMI 25–30 kg/m2, and 10.8% of patient with BMI >30 kg/m2. Following multivariable adjustment for relevant demographic, comorbidity, and treatment factors, compared to patients with BMI 18.5–25 kg/m2, patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR] 2.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07–4.78) and BMI >30 kg/m2 (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.17–2.16) were significantly more likely to experience a major complication in the 30 days following cystectomy. Among the secondary outcomes, significant differences were identified in rates of pulmonary complications (p=0.003), infectious complications (p<0.001), bleeding requiring transfusion (p=0.01), and length of stay (p=0.001). Conclusions: Patients who are outside of a normal BMI range are more likely to experience major complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association Journal→Same topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments→French-language works237,207→