A 25-Year-Old Man Presenting With Dengue Encephalitis: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a case of a 25-year-old previously healthy man who came into our emergency department with decreased verbal output and fever. Patient came in febrile, tachycardic and tachypneic. Physical examination was essentially normal; however, patient was noted to be aphasic. Initial diagnostics were requested. Complete blood count (CBC) showed leukocytosis with white blood cell count of 15 × 10 9 /L and normal platelet count of 157 × 10 9 /L. Chest X-ray was normal, and so was the urinalysis. Leptospira IgG and IgM showed negative results. Patient was suspected to have bacterial meningitis. He was then given empiric therapy and was started with ceftriaxone and vancomycin. The patient was then referred to the neurology service where a magnetic resonance angiography of the intracranial vessels was made. Results were highly suggestive of viral encephalitis. Lumbar tap for cerebrospinal fluid analysis was performed showing negative test results for cryptococcal antigen, gram stain, acid fast stain, culture and susceptibility, tuberculosis (TB) culture, negative staining, herpes simplex virus 1 and 2, and TB polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Patient was referred to the infectious disease service and a repeat CBC was requested showing leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. Dengue duo was positive together with the CSF dengue RNA-PCR. Platelet went down to as low as 14 × 10 9 /L and patient was transfused with six units of platelet concentrate. Supportive therapy was given and daily monitoring of blood counts was made. The patient started to recover on the fifth day and completely recovered and discharged on the ninth hospital day with normal blood counts and no neurologic deficit. Clin Infect Immun. 2020;5(1):10-13 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii93
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".