A core stability and endurance exercise period on back pain and CRP serum levels in the male workers with chronic low back pain.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intriduction: Aim of this research was investigate of 8 week core stability and endurance exercise on backe pain and CRP serum levels in the male workers with chronic low back pain. Method: This research was a semi-expreimental study and male workers 30-40 years Pars Khodro factory in 1394 that formed the statistical population. 30 person selected from among volunteers, and were divided into two groups of combined training (core stability, endurance) (n = 15) and control group (n = 15). In the baseline stage evaluated the amount of back pain with McGill pain questionnaire and also CRP levels through brachial blood samples. The members of the experimental group participated in 8-week exercise that included three days a week training core stability exercises and three days a week endurance exercise, and the control group were barred from participating in regularly exercise. After eight weeks, the amount of pain and the level of CRP were measured in both groups. Result: Our findings showed that 8 week core stability and enduance exercise leads to a signifiance reduction of back pain and CRP levels (P=0.001). Also, there was a significant association between CRP level and the amount of back pain in workers men as a result of participating in the training program (P=0.018). Conclusion: Due to the combined effects of core stability exercises and aerobic exercises to reduce pain and inflammation, people working in different professions can be used to reduce back pain or prevent it, to participate in this type of training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".