Excellent midterm survival and functional outcomes of a fully hydroxyapatite-coated cementless stem: first results of a prospective multicenter study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Polarstem (Smith & Nephew, Baar, Switzerland) is a tapered straight stem, an implant with an excellent survival rate. Although the most recent annual report of the National Joint Registry in the United Kingdom also reports excellent survivorship for the cementless Polarstem, no prospective studies have been published focusing on both its efficacy and clinical performance. Therefore, the present study was designed to prospectively evaluate its functional and radiographic outcomes at midterm. METHODS: This prospective observational study conducted at 3 independent orthopaedic hospitals was designed to collect data in patients undergoing cementless primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 225 total hip arthroplasties (75 at each site) were performed. The predominant diagnosis was primary osteoarthritis. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were obtained at each follow-up (3 months, and 1, 3, and 5 years). Survivorship and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index (WOMAC) were calculated. RESULTS: < .01) at all intervals through 5 years. The stem survivorship was 99.6% at 5 years with stem revision due to any reason. There were no observed cases of mechanical failure of the stem or signs of radiographic loosening. CONCLUSIONS: A revision rate of the femoral stem for any reason of 0.4%, as well as good clinical results based on HHS and WOMAC scores, was noted at 5-year follow-up. Therefore, safety and efficacy of the cementless Polarstem at midterm follow-up is confirmed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".