MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014242360 · doi:10.1111/cid.12896

Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on occurrence of peri‐implantitis in patients with periodontitis: a prospective cohort study

2020· article· en· W3014242360 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zhong Zhang, Dong Shi, Huanxin Meng, Jie Han, Li Zhang, Wenjing Li

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoft tissueMedicinePeri-implantitisPeriodontitisImplantDentistryConfoundingLogistic regressionPropensity score matchingPeriSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on health of peri-implant tissue has been addressed in few studies; thus, further research is needed. PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on the risk of peri-implantitis and peri-implant condition in patients with a history of periodontitis. DESIGN/METHODS: A total of 92 patients with a history of periodontitis were included in this study. During the implant placement, the distance from palatal soft tissue edge to the alveolar crest, which was defined as vertical soft tissue thickness, was measured. The characteristics of patients and implants were recorded at baseline (T1). After more than 2 years follow-up period, 65 patients with 159 implants finally came back for T2 evaluation, and parameters of peri-implant tissue were recorded. The associations of vertical soft tissue thickness with peri-implant parameter and occurrence of peri-implantitis were analyzed using the generalized estimating equation accompanying linear regression and logistic regression. In addition to conventional multivariate analysis, a propensity score for adjustment was used to reduce confounding bias. RESULTS: At follow-up examination (T2), survival rate at implant-level was 98.8%. The peri-implant parameters, including peri-implant probing depth and marginal bone loss, increased significantly with the increasing of soft tissue thickness (P < 0.05) after adjusting for a propensity score. In multivariate analysis adjusted for different confounding factors and propensity score, the odd ratios were all approximately 2.5, which meant that the risk of peri-implantitis increased 1.5 times for 1 mm increase of soft tissue thickness. CONCLUSIONS: The excessive vertical soft tissue thickness around implants in patients with history of periodontitis has an adverse influence on health of the peri-implant tissue. This observation raises an important question on the association between vertical soft tissue thickness during implant surgery and history of periodontitis. Effective approaches to prevent the adverse effect of excessive soft tissue thickness on peri-implant tissue are necessary to be further investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Implant Dentistry and Related ResearchSame topicDental Implant Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207