The rectus abdominus myoperitoneal flap for vaginal reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To review the indications, technique and results of the rectus abdominis myoperitoneal (RAMP) flap for vaginal reconstruction from literature and at a single institution. A literature search was conducted of vaginal reconstruction to identify published cases using RAMP flaps. All cases of vaginal reconstruction at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center (SHSC) from 2007 to 2019 were reviewed. Twenty-one published cases of vaginal reconstruction with RAMP flaps were identified. Eleven had partial longitudinal vaginal defects, 5 had circumferential defects and 5 had unspecified defects. Eight patients with circumferential (N = 3) or unspecified (N = 5) defects developed vaginal stenosis. None of the 11 patients with partial longitudinal defects developed vaginal stenosis and 8 resumed sexual activity. There were 2 cases of donor site hernia and 4 donor site infections, but no flap loss. At SHSC, 5 cases of RAMP flap vaginal reconstruction were identified. Cases 1-3 and 5 had circumferential vaginal defects and Case 4 had a partial longitudinal defect. There were no cases of flap necrosis or donor site hernia. Case 1 died 18 days after pelvic exenteration from bowel ischemia. Case 2 developed a rectovaginal fistula after an anastomotic leak from a low anterior resection. Case 3 had a wound infection and vaginal shortening to 3-4 cm. Cases 4 and 5 had no complications and the vagina appeared normal on exam post-operatively. The literature and our experience support the use of RAMP flaps for reconstruction of partial longitudinal vaginal defects but not circumferential defects where the risk of vaginal stenosis and shortening is high.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".