MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014380056 · doi:10.46298/slovo.2019.5236

Andrei Khrzhanovskii’s The Glass Harmonica (1968). Dissent in new forms.

2019· article· en· W3014380056 on OpenAlex
Laura Pontieri, Hélène Mélat

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSlovo · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Media and Visual Art
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissentStyle (visual arts)HumanitiesArtArt historyPolitical scienceVisual artsLawPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andrei Khrzhanovskii began to study and work on animation inthe wake of the more tolerant, although contradictory, spirit that characterized theKhrushchev’s Thaw, during which a few animators began to experiment with newstyles and create films on topical issues addressed to an adult public. With The GlassHarmonica Khrzhanovskii ventured to present a harsh critique of the system in a stylethat clearly departed from the prevailing children-oriented Disney style adopted in thestudio Soiuzmul’tfil’m. By proposing a subtle message about the position of the artistin a totalitarian system and endorsing a manner that contrasted with the official andapproved style, Khrzhanovskii created a work of art that, despite its exceptional artisticvalue, could be hardly accepted by the authorities. Andreï Khrjanovski a commencé à étudier l’animation et à réaliser desfilms dans l’atmosphère plus tolérante, bien qu’ambiguë, qui caractérisait le dégelkhrouchtchévien, période pendant laquelle un certain nombre d’animateurs se sontmis à expérimenter de nouveaux styles et à créer des films destinés à un public adultetraitant de problèmes d’actualité. Avec L’Harmonica de verre, Khrjanovski s’estrisqué à présenter une critique sévère du système dans un style qui se démarquaitclairement du style disneyen adopté par le studio Soïouzmoultfilm dans les dessinsanimés pour la jeunesse. En proposant un message subtil sur la situation de l’artistedans un système totalitaire et adoptant un style contrastant avec le style officiel etapprouvé, il a créé une oeuvre d’art qui, magré sa qualité exceptionnelle, ne pouvaitguère être acceptée par les autorités. Андрей Хржановский начинал работать в анимации еще ватмосфере духа большей толерантности, хотя исполненного противоречий,характеризовавшего хрущевскую Оттепель. В этот период некоторыеаниматоры стали экспериментировать с новыми стилями и создавать фильмыдля взрослой аудитории, обращенные к актуальным вопросам на злобу дня. Сосвоей Стеклянной гармоникой Хржановский смело предпринял резкую критикусистемы в стиле, очевидно далеком от стиля ориентированных на Диснеядетских мультфильмов, который превалировал на Союзмультфильме. Тонкоподавая свое идейное представление о месте художника при тоталитарнойсистеме и подписываясь под художественной манерой, контрастноотличающейся от официально принятой эстетики, Хржановский создалпроизведение искусства, которое, вопреки его исключительной художественнойценности, едва ли могло быть воспринято властью.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.716
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it