MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014407337 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13844

Effects of Ultrasonication on the Antioxidant and Anti-diabetic Properties of Hydrolyzed Oat Proteins

2019· dissertation· en· W3014407337 on OpenAlexaff
Mallory E. Walters

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonicationPapainHydrolysateProteasesHydrolysisAntioxidantChemistryZeta potentialEnzymatic hydrolysisChromatographyEnzymeExtraction (chemistry)BiochemistryFood scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method of protein extraction from foods can affect yields, compositions, and functionalities of the isolated proteins.The first objective of this work was to determine the effects of ultrasonic treatments on protein yields and polypeptide compositions.Proteins were consequently extracted from oat brans under normal (CTL) conditions and after pre-treatments of brans with ultrasonic bath (UB), and high power (HP) sonication.There was no significant difference in extraction yields (2.06 -3.79%), meanwhile gel electrophoresis and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis showed differences in polypeptide compositions.Specifically, globulin and avenin proteins were present in all samples, however, ultrasonic treatments (UB and HP) released vromindoline, a starch-bound protein, while tryptophanin, a lipid-bound protein, was released after high power ultrasonic (HP) treatment.The second objective of this work was to determine the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the proteins after hydrolysis with proteases of various specificities.Proteins from CTL, UB, HP samples were hydrolyzed by three proteases (Flavourzyme, Papain, and Alcalase) and then characterized based on their sulfhydryl (SH) content, hydrophobicity and zeta potential.Data showed that HP ultrasonic treatments decreased SH concentrations in Papain and Alcalase hydrolysates but increased it in the Flavourzyme hydrolysate.The surface charge (i.e.zeta potential) was dependent on both the protein extraction and the protease.Papain had a much weaker surface charge (-0.78 to -1.32 mV) than the other proteases (-3.67 to -9.17 mV).UB treatments increased hydrophobicity for Flavourzyme and Papain hydrolysates, while HP treatments decreased the hydrophobicity.To further evaluate the hydrolyzed proteins (i.e.hydrolysates), their biological activities were determined.It was found that in general, ultrasonic treatments reduced the antioxidant activity of the protein hydrolysates.For example, peroxyl radical scavenging activity was reduced by UB and HP sonication; however, HO• scavenging activity was reduced by HP and not UB sonication.In the antidiabetic tests, hydrolysates were evaluated for their ability to modulate the activity of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and alpha-amylase, as well as the secretion of GLP-1, a hormone that stimulates insulin response in NCI-H716 cells.Ultrasonication did not affect DPP-4 inhibition; however, concerning proteases, Papain hydrolysates had substantially greater (49.7 -53.6%)DPP-4 inhibitory activity for all conditions.HP sonication slightly decreased the alpha-amylase inhibitory activity by 4.8 -7.2% compared to UB and control.A two-fold increase in hydrolysate concentration resulted in a 13.7 -76% increase in GLP-1 secretion, indicating a dose-dependent

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207