MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014547703 · doi:10.1088/1361-6579/ab8770

Automatic heart sound classification from segmented/unsegmented phonocardiogram signals using time and frequency features

2020· article· en· W3014547703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological Measurement · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhonocardiogramHeart soundsSound (geography)Computer scienceBioacousticsSpeech recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)AcousticsArtificial intelligenceMedicineTelecommunicationsPhysicsCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Heart abnormality detection using heart sound signals (phonocardiogram (PCG)) has been an active research area for the last few decades. In this paper, automatic heart sound classification using segmented and unsegmented PCG signals is presented. APPROACH: In this paper: (i) we perform an in-depth analysis of various time and frequency domain features, followed by experimental determination of effective feature subsets for improved classification performance; (ii) both segmented and unsegmented PCG signals are studied and important results concerning the respective feature subsets and their classification performances are reported; and (iii) different classification algorithms, including the support vector machine, kth nearest neighbor, decision tree, ensemble classifier, artificial neural network and long short-term memory network (LSTMs), are employed to evaluate the performance of the proposed feature subsets and their comparison with other established features and methods is presented. MAIN RESULTS: It is observed that LSTM performs better on mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) features extracted from unsegmented PCG data, with an area under curve (AUC) score of 91.39%, however, the MFCC features do not show a consistent performance with other classifiers (the second highest AUC score is 62.08% with the decision tree classifier). In contrast, in the case of time-frequency features from segmented data, the performance of all the classifiers is appreciable with AUC scores over 70%. In particular, the conventional machine learning techniques shows consistency in achieving over 80% in AUC scores. Significanc e: The results of this study highlight the importance of time and frequency domain features. Thus it is necessary to employ both the time and frequency features of segmented PCG signals to achieve improved classification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.781

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it