Evolution and domestication of <i>Tc1/mariner</i> transposons in the genome of African coelacanth (<i>Latimeria chalumnae</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Here, we comprehensively analysed the abundance, diversity, and activity of Tc1/mariner transposons in African coelacanth (Latimeria chalumnae). Fifteen Tc1/mariner autonomous transposons were identified and grouped into six clades: DD34E/Tc1, DD34D/mariner, DD35D/Fot, DD31D/pogo, DD30-31D/pogo-like, and DD32–36D/Tigger, belonging to three known families: DD34E/Tc1, DD34D/mariner, and DD×D/pogo (DD35D/Fot, DD31D/pogo, DD30-31D/pogo-like, and DD32-36D/Tigger). Thirty-one miniature inverted-repeat transposable element (MITE) transposons of Tc1/mariner were also identified, and 20 of them display similarity to the identified autonomous transposons. The structural organization of these full Tc1/mariner elements includes a transposase gene flanked by terminal inverted repeats (TIRs) with TA dinucleotides. The transposases contain N-terminal DNA binding domain and a C-terminal catalytic domain characterized by the presence of a conservative D(Asp)DE(Glu)/D triad that is essential for transposase activity. The Tc1/mariner superfamily in coelacanth exhibited very low genome coverage (0.3%), but it experienced an extraordinary difference of proliferation dynamics among the six clades identified; moreover, most of them exhibited a very recent and current proliferation, suggesting that some copies of these transposons are putatively active. Additionally, at least four functional genes derived from Tc1/mariner transposons were found. We provide an up-to-date overview of Tc1/mariner in coelacanth, which may be helpful in determining genome and gene evolution in this living fossil.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".