Fine-tuning a blunt tool: Regulation of viral host shutoff RNases
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The evolutionary arms race between host and pathogen has resulted in the ability of many human viruses to alter the host gene expression profile during infection, in order to redirect cellular resources towards viral gene expression and inhibit cell-intrinsic host immune responses.In particular, multiple viruses globally reduce host gene expression in a process termed "host shutoff."Multiple mechanisms of host shutoff exist, including translational and transcriptional shutoff, but several viruses carry out host shutoff by encoding ribonucleases (RNases) that degrade host messenger RNAs (mRNAs).Viral host shutoff RNases include the influenza A virus polymerase acidic-X (PA-X) [1], the herpes simplex viruses (HSV-1 and -2) virion host shutoff protein (vhs) [2], and the Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) shutoff and exonuclease (SOX) protein [3] and its homologs, muSOX from murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68) [4] and BGLF5 from Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) [5].These RNases contribute to efficient formation of virions and/or reduction of innate immune signaling [6][7][8].For example, in the absence of EBV BGLF5, the virus produces fewer mature capsids, many of which remain trapped in the nucleus [7].Vhs-deficient HSV replicates well in many common tissue culture models [9] but shows replication defects in relevant cell types, such as cerebellar granule neurons [8].Moreover, in mice, viruses lacking detectable host shutoff activity replicate to lower viral titers in neuronal tissue [9], indicating a restriction of viral replication probably related to host immune responses.Influenza A virus PA-X also limits host antiviral and proinflammatory responses in several animal models [1,10,11] but has minimal effect on viral replication both in vivo and in cell culture [1,11,12].Although host shutoff RNases are important for successful viral infection, their activity presents an interesting problem for the viruses that encode them.Unregulated RNase activity could degrade viral RNAs or host mRNAs encoding proteins that the virus needs.Moreover, drastic depletion of the mRNA pool by the virus could trigger antiviral host stress responses and cell death.It is thus unsurprising that evidence is now emerging that viruses posttranslationally regulate the activity of their host shutoff RNases through a variety of mechanisms, reviewed herein (Fig 1), to finetune host gene regulation without inhibiting viral replication. Selection of targeted and protected RNAs and protein/protein interactionsAll host shutoff RNases cause global decreases in host mRNA abundance, revealed by transcriptome-wide studies [13][14][15], and display a preference for mRNAs while sparing housekeeping noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) [12,16,17].However, host shutoff RNases are less
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".