MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014735404 · doi:10.1364/oe.390612

Transparent capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) arrays for real-time photoacoustic applications

2020· article· en· W3014735404 on OpenAlexafffund
Afshin Kashani Ilkhechi, Christopher Ceroici, Zhenhao Li, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCapacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducersMaterials scienceTransducerOptoelectronicsUltrasonic sensorCapacitive sensingOpticsPiezoelectricityAcousticsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoacoustic imaging has shown great potential for non-invasive high-resolution deep-tissue imaging. Minimizing the optical and acoustic paths for excitation and detection could significantly increase the signal-to-noise ratio. This could be accomplished by transparent transducers permitting through-transducer illumination. However, most ultrasound transducers are not optically transparent. Capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducer (CMUT) technology has compelling properties compared to piezoelectric transducers such as wide bandwidth and high receive sensitivity. Here, we introduce transparent CMUT linear arrays with high transparency in the visible and near-infrared range. To fabricate the devices, we used an adhesive wafer bonding technique using photosensitive benzocyclobutene (BCB) as both a structural and adhesive layer with a glass-indium-tin-oxide (ITO) substrate. Silicon nitride is used as the membrane material ensuring hermiticity and optical transparency. Our fabricated transducer arrays consist of 64 and 128 elements with immersion operation frequency of 8 MHz, enabling high-resolution imaging. ITO, along with thin metal strips, are used as a conductive layer for the top electrodes with minimal impact on device transparency. Fabricated devices have shown average transparency of 70% in the visible wavelength range that goes up to 90% in the near-infrared range. Arrays are wire-bonded to interfacing electronics and connected to a research ultrasound platform for phantom imaging. Arrays exhibited signal-to-noise (SNR) of 40 dB with 30V bias voltage and laser fluence of 13.5 mJ / cm 2 . Arrays with 128 channels provided lateral and axial resolutions of 234 µm and 220 µm , respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.940
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations53
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207