MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014800145 · doi:10.1002/mp.14160

Frequency‐dependent signal and noise in spectroscopic x‐ray imaging

2020· article· en· W3014800145 on OpenAlexafffund
Jesse Tanguay, Jinwoo Kim, Ho Kyung Kim, Kris Iniewski, Ian A. Cunningham

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityRedlen Technologies (Canada)Toronto Metropolitan University
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Science, ICT and Future PlanningNational Research Foundation
KeywordsCharge sharingNoise (video)PhotonPhysicsAliasingDetectorPhoton countingMonte Carlo methodNoise powerOpticsSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Computational physicsEnergy (signal processing)StatisticsComputer sciencePower (physics)TelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We present a new framework for theoretical analysis of the noise power spectrum (NPS) of photon-counting x-ray detectors, including simple photon-counting detectors (SPCDs) and spectroscopic x-ray detectors (SXDs), the latter of which use multiple energy thresholds to discriminate photon energies. METHODS: We show that the NPS of SPCDs and SXDs, including spatio-energetic noise correlations, is determined by the joint probability density function (PDF) of deposited photon energies, which describes the probability of recording two photons of two different energies in two different elements following a single-photon interaction. We present an analytic expression for this joint PDF and calculate the presampling and digital NPS of CdTe SPCDs and SXDs. We calibrate our charge sharing model using the energy response of a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) spectroscopic x-ray detector and compare theoretical results with Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Our analysis shows that charge sharing increases pixel signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), but degrades the zero-frequency signal-to-noise performance of SPCDs and SXDs. In all cases considered, this degradation was greater than 10%. Comparing the presampling NPS with the sampled NPS showed that degradation in zero-frequency performance is due to zero-frequency noise aliasing induced by charge sharing. CONCLUSIONS: Noise performance, including spatial and energy correlations between elements and energy bins, are described by the joint PDF of deposited energies which provides a method of determining the photon-counting NPS, including noise-aliasing effects and spatio-energetic effects in spectral imaging. Our approach enables separating noise due to x-ray interactions from that associated with sampling, consistent with cascaded systems analysis of energy-integrating systems. Our methods can be incorporated into task-based assessment of image quality for the design and optimization of spectroscopic x-ray detectors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingFrench-language works237,207