Frequency‐dependent signal and noise in spectroscopic x‐ray imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: We present a new framework for theoretical analysis of the noise power spectrum (NPS) of photon-counting x-ray detectors, including simple photon-counting detectors (SPCDs) and spectroscopic x-ray detectors (SXDs), the latter of which use multiple energy thresholds to discriminate photon energies. METHODS: We show that the NPS of SPCDs and SXDs, including spatio-energetic noise correlations, is determined by the joint probability density function (PDF) of deposited photon energies, which describes the probability of recording two photons of two different energies in two different elements following a single-photon interaction. We present an analytic expression for this joint PDF and calculate the presampling and digital NPS of CdTe SPCDs and SXDs. We calibrate our charge sharing model using the energy response of a cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) spectroscopic x-ray detector and compare theoretical results with Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS: Our analysis shows that charge sharing increases pixel signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), but degrades the zero-frequency signal-to-noise performance of SPCDs and SXDs. In all cases considered, this degradation was greater than 10%. Comparing the presampling NPS with the sampled NPS showed that degradation in zero-frequency performance is due to zero-frequency noise aliasing induced by charge sharing. CONCLUSIONS: Noise performance, including spatial and energy correlations between elements and energy bins, are described by the joint PDF of deposited energies which provides a method of determining the photon-counting NPS, including noise-aliasing effects and spatio-energetic effects in spectral imaging. Our approach enables separating noise due to x-ray interactions from that associated with sampling, consistent with cascaded systems analysis of energy-integrating systems. Our methods can be incorporated into task-based assessment of image quality for the design and optimization of spectroscopic x-ray detectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".