MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014835082 · doi:10.1364/ome.389151

Second harmonic generation in ferroelectric Ba<sub>2</sub>EuFeNb<sub>4</sub>O<sub>15</sub>-based epitaxial thin films

2020· article· en· W3014835082 on OpenAlexafffund
Thameur Hajlaoui, Maxime Pinsard, Hossein Kalhori, François Légaré, A. Pignolet

Bibliographic record

VenueOptical Materials Express · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsMaterials scienceFerroelectricityTetragonal crystal systemSecond-harmonic generationThin filmEpitaxyTungstenOptoelectronicsPulsed laser depositionSubstrate (aquarium)OpticsCrystal structureLaserNanotechnologyCrystallographyDielectricMetallurgyLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ba2EuFeNb4O15-based epitaxial ferroelectric thin films with tetragonal tungsten bronze crystal structures are shown to have nonlinear optical properties at room temperature and are promising candidates for integrated optical frequency convertors and related applications. High quality epitaxial ferroelectric thin films of tetragonal tungsten bronze Ba2EuFeNb4O15 have been synthesized on MgO(100) by pulsed laser deposition. Structural investigation reveals that the c-oriented films are rotated in plane by ±18.4° and ±31° with respect to the substrate structure. Stable ferroelectric properties were obtained by microelectromechanical characterization. Second harmonic generation related to the spontaneous polarization in the films was studied and the independent components of the nonlinear susceptibility were determined. Ferroelectric films of Ba2EuFeNb4O15 having a tetragonal tungsten bronze structure are new candidate for room temperature nonlinear optical applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptical Materials ExpressSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207