MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3014861166 · doi:10.1134/s0040579520010182

Bio-Foam Internals for Potential Water Treatment Units Adapted to Marine Applications: Hydrodynamic Study

2020· article· en· W3014861166 on OpenAlexaff
Iman Mohammed, Amir Motamed Dashliborun, Faı̈çal Larachi

Bibliographic record

VenueTheoretical Foundations of Chemical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMarine engineeringEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Reliance on harmless and renewable resources to mitigate process environmental footprint has become increasingly important for the design and operation of sustainable processes. One challenge that is prevalent in marine water surface contamination concerns treatment and recovery from oil spills where efforts are needed to design emergency units adapted to marine conditions. Potential candidates are naturally-grown porous loofa (bio-foam) materials which can be integrated in floating units transportable to the contamination area. For this purpose, a hexapod platform motion simulator was employed to emulate sea-driven floating movements of a column packed with two loofa bio-foam packings (dense and open-cell samples) and operated in cocurrent gas-liquid upflow mode. The column hydrodynamic behaviour was monitored by means of capacitance wire mesh sensors and electrical capacitance tomography for various inclination and rolling parameters. In the case of dense bio-foam packing, the relatively even distribution of gas and liquid in the vertical bed tended to degrade as the bed tilted up to 15°. Column rolling prompted fluid displacements in bed crosswise planes inducing notable amplitude oscillations of the local liquid saturation. Kerosene exhibited a strong foaming behavior with promotion of earlier inception of pulsing flow as a function of column inclination as compared to water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.723
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTheoretical Foundations of Chemical EngineeringSame topicElectrohydrodynamics and Fluid DynamicsFrench-language works237,207