CircMiner: accurate and rapid detection of circular RNA through splice-aware pseudo-alignment scheme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: The ubiquitous abundance of circular RNAs (circRNAs) has been revealed by performing high-throughput sequencing in a variety of eukaryotes. circRNAs are related to some diseases, such as cancer in which they act as oncogenes or tumor-suppressors and, therefore, have the potential to be used as biomarkers or therapeutic targets. Accurate and rapid detection of circRNAs from short reads remains computationally challenging. This is due to the fact that identifying chimeric reads, which is essential for finding back-splice junctions, is a complex process. The sensitivity of discovery methods, to a high degree, relies on the underlying mapper that is used for finding chimeric reads. Furthermore, all the available circRNA discovery pipelines are resource intensive. RESULTS: We introduce CircMiner, a novel stand-alone circRNA detection method that rapidly identifies and filters out linear RNA sequencing reads and detects back-splice junctions. CircMiner employs a rapid pseudo-alignment technique to identify linear reads that originate from transcripts, genes or the genome. CircMiner further processes the remaining reads to identify the back-splice junctions and detect circRNAs with single-nucleotide resolution. We evaluated the efficacy of CircMiner using simulated datasets generated from known back-splice junctions and showed that CircMiner has superior accuracy and speed compared to the existing circRNA detection tools. Additionally, on two RNase R treated cell line datasets, CircMiner was able to detect most of consistent, high confidence circRNAs compared to untreated samples of the same cell line. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CircMiner is implemented in C++ and is available online at https://github.com/vpc-ccg/circminer. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".