MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015167055 · doi:10.1515/9781571136886-014

12: The Modernist Aesthetic: Hugh Hood, “Flying a Red Kite” (1962)

2007· book-chapter· en· W3015167055 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jutta Zimmermann

Bibliographic record

VenueBoydell and Brewer eBooks · 2007
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt historyArtHistoryLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I n spite of critical controversy over Hugh Hood's place in Canadian literary history, it is safe to say that his literary oeuvre occupies a unique position in the canon owing to the way in which he combines an overt Christian content with a decidedly modernist form. In a more immediate way than is perhaps the case with most writers, Hood's literary career seems to have been shaped by his family background and academic training. Born in 1928 to Catholic parents in Toronto, Hood went to a Catholic school, received a Ph.D. in English at the University of Toronto, and taught at a college in the United States before establishing himself as a professor of English in Montreal in 1961. He emerged as a writer in 1962 when his first short-story collection, Flying a Red Kite , was published. In his prolific literary career, which spanned four decades — Hood died in 2000 — he published nine more collections of short stories ( Around the Mountain: Scenes from Montreal Life , 1967; The Fruit Man, the Meat Man and the Manager , 1971; Dark Glasses , 1976; None Genuine without This Signature , 1980; August Nights , 1985; A Short Walk in the Rain , 1989; The Isolation Booth , 1991; You'll Catch Your Death , 1992; and After All! , 2003) and seventeen novels — among them a series entitled The New Age, which tells the story of Canada's coming of age in the twentieth century and is modeled on Marcel Proust's A la recherche du temps perdu . Hood's entire oeuvre is marked by his religious belief and his concern with the spiritual dimension of human existence. Rather than conveying any dogmatic religious position, however, Hood explores the relation between the mundane and the spiritual, the “secular and sacred experience” (Lecker 1982, 99). “Canada's most learned, most intellectual writer” (Keith 1980, 28) has never been a popular writer, and critics are divided about his role in Canadian literature. Admirers praise his work as an exceptional literary achievement. While lauded “as one of Canada's most versatile, sophisticated, and aesthetically self-conscious fiction writers” (Lecker 1986, 226), he is also criticized for his “unfashionably exemplary fiction” (Gadpaille 1988, 101).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.948

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0160.017
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBoydell and Brewer eBooksSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207