MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015205157 · doi:10.14288/1.0389775

High-efficiency and low noise planar transformers for power converters : paired layers interleaving

2020· article· en· W3015205157 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Ali Saket

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Collections · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterleavingConvertersTransformerElectrical engineeringPlanarNoise (video)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringVoltageArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, many applications, such as consumer electronics, the automotive industry, and telecoms require high power density and low height power electronics converters. To implement slim power converters, Planar Transformers (PT) have emerged, featuring low height, low leakage inductance, and low thermal resistance. Despite these benefits, PTs have large parasitic capacitance, which degrades the performance of power converters. Capacitive effects in transformers are divided into two groups: inter-winding and intra-winding capacitance. Inter-winding capacitance generates large amounts of Common-Mode (CM) noise, creating serious Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) problems. Intra-winding capacitance affects the performance of the converter and can cause loss of voltage regulation in the LLC resonant converter. The inter-winding capacitance can be reduced by separating primary and secondary windings, at the cost of increased leakage inductance and AC resistance. On the other hand, interleaved structures minimize AC resistance and leakage inductance but significantly increase the inter-winding capacitance. Therefore, there is an unfortunate trade-off in the transformer design. In order to resolve this trade-off as well as problems resulting from PTs large parasitic capacitance, this dissertation develops new design methods that target the root cause of the problem. A detailed parasitic capacitance model is developed for PTs that relate the distributed capacitance of layers to the equivalent circuit of the transformer. Based on this model, the concept of paired layers is introduced that provides criteria to achieve zero CM noise generation in PTs. Paired layers can be used to design interleaved structures that not only have low AC resistance and leakage inductance but also have almost zero CM noise generation. Multiple examples are provided for different types of windings, different turn ratios, and different topologies to show the generality of the method. The proposed method is validated using analysis, Finite Element Method (FEM), and experiments. Besides the paired layers method, this dissertation studies the detrimental effects of PTs large intrawinding capacitance on light-load voltage regulation of LLC resonant converter. It is shown that large intrawinding capacitance results in loss of voltage regulation. To resolve this, six improved winding layouts with low intra-winding capacitance are presented to maintain voltage regulation even under no-load condition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen CollectionsSame topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207