Cooperative Computation Offloading in FiWi Enhanced 4G HetNets Using Self-Organizing MEC
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multi-access edge computing (MEC) is an emerging paradigm to meet the rapidly growing computation demands of mobile applications. This paper investigates the performance gains of cooperative computation offloading for MEC enabled FiWi enhanced HetNets with capacity-limited backhaul links. After presenting the envisioned two-tier MEC architecture for a FiWi based networking infrastructure, we propose a simple but efficient offloading strategy, which relies on the flexible trilateral cooperation between end-device, edge servers, and the remote cloud. We then present an analytical framework to estimate the average response time and energy consumption of mobile users for various offloading scenarios with different wireless access modes (i.e., WiFi and 4G LTE-A). The presented analysis flexibly allows for incorporating both offloaded and conventional human-to-human (H2H) traffic of mobile users as well as fixed (wired) subscribers. Finally, we present our self-organization based mechanism, which enables mobile users to make suitable energy-delay trade-offs by jointly minimizing the average task execution time and energy consumption, using only their local information. The obtained results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed cooperative self-organizing offloading strategy and its superior performance over schemes with MEC- or cloud-only offloading strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".