MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015340109 · doi:10.1128/mra.00168-20

Whole-Genome Draft Assemblies of Difficult-to-Classify Escherichia coli O157 and Non-O157 Isolates from Feces of Canadian Feedlot Cattle

2020· article· en· W3015340109 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Vinícius Silva Castro, Eduardo Eustáquio de Souza Figueiredo, Tim A. McAllister, Robin King, Tim Reuter, Rodrigo Ortega Polo, Carlos Adam Conte‐Júnior, Kim Stanford

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Resource Announcements · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEscherichia coli research studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorAlberta Agriculture and Forestry
KeywordsEscherichia coliFecesShiga toxinBiologyGenomeFeedlotMicrobiologyGeneticsGeneAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forty-eight Escherichia coli strains were chosen due to variable detection of stx or serogroup by PCR. Although all strains were initially determined to be Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), their genomes revealed 11 isolates carrying stx 1a , stx 1b , stx 2a , and/or stx 2b . Assembled genome sizes varied between 4,667,418 and 5,556,121 bp, with N 50 values between 79,648 and 294,166 bp and G+C contents between 50.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.536

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology Resource AnnouncementsSame topicEscherichia coli research studiesFrench-language works237,207