Chemical modification of poly(1‐butene) resins through reactive processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Controlled‐rheology poly(1‐butene) resins have been produced by chemical modification of commodity poly(1‐butene) (PB‐1) resins through reactive processing with an organic peroxide. Using various amounts of peroxide, samples have been produced and have been analyzed in terms of their molecular and rheological properties. Molecular weight distributions (MWD) as determined by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) indicate that polydispersity (PDI) remains approximately constant but weight‐average molecular weight (M w ) decreases with increasing peroxide concentration. These trends are in agreement with predictions from a kinetic model previously developed for the production of controlled‐rheology polypropylene. Linear viscoelastic measurements indicate that the modified samples are thermorheologically simple and that zero‐shear viscosity decreases with increasing peroxide concentration while flow activation energy remains approximately constant. Finally, no significant variation in melting and crystallization properties was observed for the range of peroxide concentrations used. Based on these results, it is proposed that tailor‐made controlled‐rheology poly(1‐butene) resins can be produced easily through reactive extrusion operations similar to those used for the production of controlled‐rheology polypropylene (CRPP).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".