MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015599598 · doi:10.3390/electronics9040622

Prioritized Uplink Resource Allocation in Smart Grid Backscatter Communication Networks via Deep Reinforcement Learning

2020· article· en· W3015599598 on OpenAlexaff
Zhixiang Yang, Lei Feng, Zhengwei Chang, Jizhao Lu, Rongke Liu, Michel Kadoch, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsTelecommunications linkComputer scienceReinforcement learningWirelessResource allocationSmart gridAsynchronous communicationThroughputComputer networkWireless sensor networkBackscatter (email)Distributed computingReal-time computingTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rapid increase in the number of wireless sensor terminals in smart grids, backscattering has become a very promising green technology. By means of backscattering, wireless sensors can either reflect energy signals in the environment to exchange information with each other or capture the energy signals to recharge their batteries. However, the changing environment around wireless sensors, limited radio frequency and various service priorities in uplink communications bring great challenges in allocation resources. In this paper, we put forward a backscatter communication model based on business priority and cognitive network. In order to achieve optimal throughput of system, an asynchronous advantage actor-critic (A3C) algorithm is designed to tackle the problem of uplink resource allocation. The experimental results indicate that the presented scheme can significantly enhance overall system performance and ensure the business requirements of high-priority users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207