Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies coordinated multipoint (CoMP) transmission with non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) for a simultaneous wireless information and power transfer (SWIPT) network. We investigate two different CoMP-NOMA schemes, namely joint transmission-NOMA (JT-NOMA) and Alamouti NOMA (A-NOMA). Also, as the benchmark, joint transmission orthogonal multiple access (JT-OMA) is considered. Expressions are derived for the outage probabilities achieved by JT-NOMA, A-NOMA, and JT-OMA for cell edge users with quality of service (QoS) requirements. To compare these schemes in terms of spectral efficiency, we use the ε-outage rate region that is defined to be the set of all achievable rate pairs at which the outage probabilities are equal to ε. It is shown that A-NOMA is superior to both JT-NOMA and JT-OMA in high SNR. Also, it is analytically proved that JT-NOMA outperforms JT-OMA, when the circuit energy consumption is negligible. A particularly interesting observation is that when the circuit energy consumption is non-negligible, JT-NOMA is not always better than JT-OMA. It is shown that when the difference between the expectations of effective channel power gains is not sufficiently large, JT-OMA is superior to JT-NOMA for the same circuit energy consumption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it