MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015662163 · doi:10.1111/biom.13277

A powerful procedure that controls the false discovery rate with directional information

2020· article· en· W3015662163 on OpenAlexafffund
Zhaoyang Tian, Kun Liang, Pengfei Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBiometrics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFalse discovery rateMultiple comparisons problemComputer scienceStatistical hypothesis testingData miningControl (management)Value (mathematics)StatisticsComputational biologyMachine learningArtificial intelligenceMathematicsBiologyGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many multiple testing applications in genetics, the signs of the test statistics provide useful directional information, such as whether genes are potentially up- or down-regulated between two experimental conditions. However, most existing procedures that control the false discovery rate (FDR) are P-value based and ignore such directional information. We introduce a novel procedure, the signed-knockoff procedure, to utilize the directional information and control the FDR in finite samples. We demonstrate the power advantage of our procedure through simulation studies and two real applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.113
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.275
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1130.275
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.390
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.076 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiometricsSame topicStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsFrench-language works237,207