MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015693487 · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/ab5d50

Roadmap on Wilson loops in 3d Chern–Simons-matter theories

2020· article· en· W3015693487 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nadav Drukker, Diego Trancanelli, Lorenzo Bianchi, Marco S. Bianchi, Diego H. Correa, Валентина Форини, Luca Griguolo, Matías Leoni, Fedor Levkovich-Maslyuk, Gabriel Nagaoka, Silvia Penati, Michelangelo Preti, Malte Probst, Pavel Putrov, Domenico Seminara, Guillermo A. Silva, Marcia Tenser, Maxime Trépanier, Edoardo Vescovi, Itamar Yaakov, Jiaju Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasEinstein Stiftung BerlinUniversidad Nacional de La PlataH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoScience and Technology Facilities CouncilUniversità Degli Studi di Modena e Reggio EmilaMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean CommissionAgence Nationale de la RechercheKing's College LondonFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsChern–Simons theoryField (mathematics)Theoretical physicsEpistemologyPhysicsPhilosophyMathematical physicsGauge theoryMathematicsPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This is a compact review of recent results on supersymmetric Wilson loops in ABJ(M) and related theories. It aims to be a quick introduction to the state of the art in the field and a discussion of open problems. It is divided into short chapters devoted to different questions and techniques. Some new results, perspectives and speculations are also presented. We hope this might serve as a baseline for further studies of this topic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207