MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015723115 · doi:10.1080/09603123.2020.1746745

Socioeconomic factors and bacillary dysentery risk in Jiangsu Province, China: a spatial investigation using Bayesian hierarchical models

2020· article· en· W3015723115 on OpenAlexaff
Sabrina L. Li, Alexandra M. Schmidt, Susan J. Elliott

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Environmental Health Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGlobal Health Care Issues
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacillary dysenterySocioeconomic statusChinaEnvironmental healthBayesian probabilityGeographyDysenteryStatisticsMedicineMathematicsBiologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacillary dysentery (BD) is an acute diarrheal disease prevalent in areas affected by socioeconomic disparities. We investigated BD risk and its associations with socioeconomic factors at the county-level in Jiangsu province, China using epidemiological and socioeconomic data from 2011-2014. We fitted four Bayesian hierarchical models with various prior specifications for random effects. As all model comparison criteria values were similar, we presented results from a reparameterized Besag-York-Mollié model, which addressed issues with the identifiability of variance captured by spatial and independent effects. Our model adjusted for year and socioeconomic status showed 18-65% decreased BD risk compared to 2011. We found a high relative risk in the northwestern and southwestern counties. Increasing the percentage of rural households, rural income per capita, health institutions per capita, or hospital beds per capita decreases the relative risk of BD, respectively. Our findings can be used to improve infectious diarrhea surveillance and enhance existing public health interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.151
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Environmental Health ResearchSame topicGlobal Health Care IssuesFrench-language works237,207