Abnormal grain growth during annealing in the Al/Al<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> composite produced by accumulative roll bonding
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mechanical and physical properties of composites are related to the matrix microstructure and reinforcements dispersion. Microstructural evolution during annealing can change the properties of the composites. Consequently, in this paper, the microstructural evolution of Al/Al2O3 composite during annealing and the interpretation of metallurgical phenomena were investigated. Accumulative roll bonding technique was used for manufacturing the Al/Al2O3 composite. The Al/Al2O3 composite specimens were further annealed at 375 °C for 15, 30 and 60 min without any protected atmosphere. The grain orientation (texture) and the grain size of the composites were investigated. Results showed that by increasing the annealing time to 60 min, abnormal grain growth started. Moreover, the frequency of low angle boundaries (1.5–5) increased, while the frequency of ∑3 Coincident Site Lattice boundaries decreased. In fact, grain boundaries with low Coincident Site Lattice were less prone to reinforcement pinning. Then low Coincident Site Lattice boundaries were more susceptible to formation and growth of abnormal grains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".