Spatial Linear Dynamic Relationship of Strongly Connected Multiagent Systems and Adaptive Learning Control for Different Formations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses an important problem of how to improve the learnability of an intelligent agent in a strongly connected multiagent network. A novel spatial-dimensional linear dynamic relationship (SLDR) is developed to formulate the spatial dynamic relationship of an agent with respect to all the related agents. The obtained SLDR virtually exists in the computer to describe the input-output (I/O) relationship in the spatial domain and an iterative adaptation mechanism is developed to update the SLDR using I/O information to show real-time dynamical behavior of multiagent systems with nonrepetitive initial states. Subsequently, an SLDR-based adaptive iterative learning control (SLDR-AILC) is presented with rigorous analysis for iteration-variant formation control targets. Not only the 3-D dynamic behavior of the multiagent network but also the control protocols of the communicated agents are incorporated in the learning mechanism and thus strong learnability of the proposed SLDR-AILC is achieved to improve control performance. The proposed SLDR-AILC is a data-driven scheme where no explicit model structure is needed. Simulations with strongly connected topologies verify the theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it