Spatial Linear Dynamic Relationship of Strongly Connected Multiagent Systems and Adaptive Learning Control for Different Formations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article addresses an important problem of how to improve the learnability of an intelligent agent in a strongly connected multiagent network. A novel spatial-dimensional linear dynamic relationship (SLDR) is developed to formulate the spatial dynamic relationship of an agent with respect to all the related agents. The obtained SLDR virtually exists in the computer to describe the input-output (I/O) relationship in the spatial domain and an iterative adaptation mechanism is developed to update the SLDR using I/O information to show real-time dynamical behavior of multiagent systems with nonrepetitive initial states. Subsequently, an SLDR-based adaptive iterative learning control (SLDR-AILC) is presented with rigorous analysis for iteration-variant formation control targets. Not only the 3-D dynamic behavior of the multiagent network but also the control protocols of the communicated agents are incorporated in the learning mechanism and thus strong learnability of the proposed SLDR-AILC is achieved to improve control performance. The proposed SLDR-AILC is a data-driven scheme where no explicit model structure is needed. Simulations with strongly connected topologies verify the theoretical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".