MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3015931830 · doi:10.12788/jhm.3426

All Hands on Deck: Learning to “Un‐specialize” in the COVID‐19 Pandemic

2020· article· en· W3015931830 on OpenAlexaffabout
Peter Cram, Mel L. Anderson, Erin E. Shaughnessy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hospital Medicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsSinai Health SystemUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Institute on Aging
KeywordsPhoenixSpecialtyMedicineGeriatricsFamily medicineGerontologyLibrary sciencePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal of Hospital MedicineVolume 15, Issue 5 p. 314-315 Perspectives in Hospital Medicine All Hands on Deck: Learning to "Un-specialize" in the COVID-19 Pandemic Peter Cram MD, MBA, Corresponding Author Peter Cram MD, MBA [email protected] Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaCorresponding Author: Peter Cram, MD, MBA; Email: [email protected]; Twitter: @pmcram.Search for more papers by this authorMel L Anderson MD, Mel L Anderson MD Primary and Specialty Care Service Line, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MinnesotaSearch for more papers by this authorErin E Shaughnessy MD, MSHCM, Erin E Shaughnessy MD, MSHCM Division of Hospital Medicine, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, ArizonaSearch for more papers by this author Peter Cram MD, MBA, Corresponding Author Peter Cram MD, MBA [email protected] Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Sinai Health System and University Health Network, Toronto, Canada Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaCorresponding Author: Peter Cram, MD, MBA; Email: [email protected]; Twitter: @pmcram.Search for more papers by this authorMel L Anderson MD, Mel L Anderson MD Primary and Specialty Care Service Line, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MinnesotaSearch for more papers by this authorErin E Shaughnessy MD, MSHCM, Erin E Shaughnessy MD, MSHCM Division of Hospital Medicine, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona Department of Pediatrics, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, ArizonaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 07 April 2020 https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3426Citations: 3Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Graphical Abstract References 1Smith A. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press; 1976. Google Scholar 2Cram P, Ettinger WH, Jr. Generalists or specialists–who does it better? Physician Exec. 1998; 24(1): 40–45. CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 3 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME Response to Pandemic Crisis. https://acgme.org/COVID-19. Accessed April 1, 2020. Google Scholar 4 The Joint Commission. Emergency Management—Meeting FPPE and OPPE Requirements During the COVID-19 Emergency. https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/standard-faqs/hospital-and-hospital-clinics/medical-staff-ms/000002291/. Accessed April 1, 2020. Google Scholar 5Petropoulos F, Makridakis S. Forecasting the novel coronavirus COVID-19. PLoS One. 2020; 15(3):e0231236. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231236.eCollection2020. 10.1371/journal.pone.0231236 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6Ioannidis JPA. Coronavirus disease 2019: the harms of exaggerated information and non-evidence-based measures. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020;e13222. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13222. Google Scholar 7Antommaria M. Conflicting duties and reciprocal obligations during a pandemic. J Hosp Med. 2020; 15(5): 284–286. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3425. 10.12788/jhm.3425 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume15, Issue5May 2020Pages 314-315 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.037
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.037
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0060.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hospital MedicineSame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207