XAB2 prevents abortive recombinational repair of replication-associated DNA double-strand breaks and its loss is synthetic lethal with RAD52 inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Unrepaired O 6 -methylguanine lesions induced by the alkylating chemotherapy agent temozolomide lead to replication-associated single-ended DNA double-strand breaks (seDSBs) that are repaired predominantly through RAD51-mediated homologous recombination (HR). Here, we show that loss of the pre-mRNA splicing and DNA repair protein XAB2 leads to increased temozolomide sensitivity in glioblastoma cells, which reflects abortive HR due to Ku retention on resected seDSBs. XAB2-dependent Ku eviction also occurred at seDSBs generated by the topoisomerase I poison campthotecin and operated in parallel to an ATM-dependent pathway previously described. Although Ku retention elicited by loss of XAB2 did not prevent RAD51 focus formation, the resulting RAD51-ssDNA associations were unproductive, leading to increased engagement of non-homologous-end-joining in S/G2 and genetic instability. Overexpression of RAD51 or the single-stranded DNA annealing factor RAD52 rescued the XAB2 defects. RAD52 depletion led to severe temozolomide sensitivity, whereas a synthetic lethality interaction was observed between RAD52 and XAB2.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".