MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016128200 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.155111

Weak localization in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>TiS</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> microflakes

2020· article· lv· W3016128200 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhaoguo Li, Jicheng Zhang, Minjie Zhou, Yong Zeng, Daojian Qi, Jia Li

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B./Physical review. B · 2020
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMaterials Science
TopicOrganic and Molecular Conductors Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCanadian Association of Emergency Physicians
KeywordsElectrical resistivity and conductivityPhysicsCondensed matter physicsWeak localizationMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanicsMagnetoresistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied the electrical transport in the charge-density wave material $1T\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{TiS}{\mathrm{e}}_{2}$ microflakes. In the low temperatures, the logarithmic temperature-dependent resistivity corrections were observed. In particular, the negative magnetoresistances in low magnetic fields were further measured and well described by the Hikami-Larkin-Nagaoka theory. All the experimental results demonstrate the weak localization effect in the $1T\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{TiS}{\mathrm{e}}_{2}$ microflakes. Furthermore, the power-law dependence of the extracted phase coherence length on temperature is $\ensuremath{\sim}{T}^{\ensuremath{-}0.6}$, indicating the presence of the two-dimensional electron-electron interaction in the $1T\ensuremath{-}\mathrm{TiS}{\mathrm{e}}_{2}$ microflakes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2410.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B./Physical review. BSame topicOrganic and Molecular Conductors ResearchFrench-language works237,207