<i>Bildung</i>, Negative Exceptionalism, and the End of Genealogy in Robert Walser’s <i>Jakob von Gunten</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Focusing on the servant, this article analyzes figurations of disobedience in Robert Walser’s novel Jakob von Gunten (1909) in dialogue with formal genre conventions. Jakob von Gunten: Ein Tagebuch presents itself as the diary of the eponymous protagonist who, at the beginning of the twentieth century, enters a school for servants in Berlin to break with his aristocratic lineage. In contrast to the narrative arc of the Bildungsroman and Entwicklungsroman that envisages self-realization through progressive education, the novel abandons teleological emplotment in favour of the performance of servility. Rather than embracing the Enlightenment program of self-realization through learning and experience, Jakob overtly champions a downward career in defiance of both his aristocratic origins and developmental progress. However, this article demonstrates that, in the context of modernity, his role play as a quasi-feudal servant stages negative exceptionalism as a new form of perfection: Jakob wants to turn into “eine reizende kugelrunde Null” precisely because this zero position without value generates absolute agency. The analysis of the formal features of Jakob’s diary entries complements the thematic exploration of his escapades, dreams, and fantasies, which often stage an aggrandized and omnipotent alter ego. In so doing, I show that the performance of disobedience in Walser’s novel articulates an exclusive and elusive subjectivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".