MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016217016 · doi:10.30645/kesatria.v1i1.11

Penerapan K-Means Dalam Mengelompokkan Nilai Tambah Industri Besar/Sedang Menurut Kabupaten/Kota

2020· article· en· W3016217016 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pika Aryani, Ema Meyliza

Bibliographic record

VenueKESATRIA Jurnal Penerapan Sistem Informasi (Komputer & Manajemen) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)CentroidTertiary sector of the economyBusinessService (business)ManufacturingGeographyMarketingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Each region must have industries both primary industries, secondary industries, manufacturing industries, construction industries, service industries and the quarter industry. These industries must produce an output that will be used or consumed by consumers or the public. More and more industries in a region indicates that the region has a lot of market demand from the community and the more industries, the income in the industry of a region increases. In this study the data was taken from a government website namely BPS (Statistics Indonesia) - www.bps.go.id which is a website that presents various statistical data from each region. There are 2 clusters in this study, namely high level clusters (C1) and low level clusters (C2). This study stopped at the 2nd iteration and there were centroid data generated namely high level centroid (78177, 56543, 42610, 155596) and low level centroid namely: ((3513.3), (3448.8), (2390.9) ), (4568)). From the calculation process that has been carried out there are 2 high-level districts / cities namely (Deli Serdang and Medan) and 31 other low-level districts / cities. It is hoped that this research can be input to the government in each region to inform the output data generated from industry in each region, and then the data can be used whenever needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKESATRIA Jurnal Penerapan Sistem Informasi (Komputer & Manajemen)Same topicData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207