MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016217016 · doi:10.30645/kesatria.v1i1.11

Penerapan K-Means Dalam Mengelompokkan Nilai Tambah Industri Besar/Sedang Menurut Kabupaten/Kota

2020· article· en· W3016217016 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueKESATRIA Jurnal Penerapan Sistem Informasi (Komputer & Manajemen) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Quarter (Canadian coin)CentroidTertiary sector of the economyBusinessService (business)ManufacturingGeographyMarketingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Each region must have industries both primary industries, secondary industries, manufacturing industries, construction industries, service industries and the quarter industry. These industries must produce an output that will be used or consumed by consumers or the public. More and more industries in a region indicates that the region has a lot of market demand from the community and the more industries, the income in the industry of a region increases. In this study the data was taken from a government website namely BPS (Statistics Indonesia) - www.bps.go.id which is a website that presents various statistical data from each region. There are 2 clusters in this study, namely high level clusters (C1) and low level clusters (C2). This study stopped at the 2nd iteration and there were centroid data generated namely high level centroid (78177, 56543, 42610, 155596) and low level centroid namely: ((3513.3), (3448.8), (2390.9) ), (4568)). From the calculation process that has been carried out there are 2 high-level districts / cities namely (Deli Serdang and Medan) and 31 other low-level districts / cities. It is hoped that this research can be input to the government in each region to inform the output data generated from industry in each region, and then the data can be used whenever needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it