Intramolecular chaperone-mediated secretion of an Rhs effector toxin by a type VI secretion system
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacterial Rhs proteins containing toxic domains are often secreted by type VI secretion systems (T6SSs) through unclear mechanisms. Here, we show that the T6SS Rhs-family effector TseI of Aeromonas dhakensis is subject to self-cleavage at both the N- and the C-terminus, releasing the middle Rhs core and two VgrG-interacting domains (which we name VIRN and VIRC). VIRC is an endonuclease, and the immunity protein TsiI protects against VIRC toxicity through direct interaction. Proteolytic release of VIRC and VIRN is mediated, respectively, by an internal aspartic protease activity and by two conserved glutamic residues in the Rhs core. Mutations abolishing self-cleavage do not block secretion, but reduce TseI toxicity. Deletion of VIRN or the Rhs core abolishes secretion. TseI homologs from Pseudomonas syringae, P. aeruginosa, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus are also self-cleaved. VIRN and VIRC interact with protein VgrG1, while the Rhs core interacts with protein TecI. We propose that VIRN and the Rhs core act as T6SS intramolecular chaperones to facilitate toxin secretion and function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".