MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Oxygen Consumption and Substrate Oxidation Rates Following Passive Acclimation to a Hot Environment

2020· article· en· W3016343125 on OpenAlexaffabout
Clara Vada Etter, Andrew E. Beaudin, M.L. Walsh, Matthew D. White

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcclimatizationAnimal scienceOxygenChemistryVO2 maxMedicineBiologyInternal medicineHeart rateEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Acclimation to a hot environment via prolonged or repeated, daily exposure to a heat stress results in adaptations of the human thermoregulatory responses. In this study, it was investigated whether metabolic responses to passive heat acclimation (HA) adapted similarly to thermoregulatory heat loss responses including following a 10‐day, 2 h·day −1 passive heat acclimation (HA) to 50°C and 20 % RH. This study was approved by the Simon Fraser University Office of Research Ethics. Purpose It was hypothesized that, similar to that seen during active heat acclimation with exercise, there would be an elevation of oxygen consumption following a passive heat acclimation. It was also hypothesized that following heat acclimation there would be increased lipid oxidation relative to the pre‐acclimation state. Methods Nine male participants performed two immersions in a 40°C bath separated by a 10‐day passive heat acclimation. Heat acclimation was performed in a climatic chamber controlled at 50°C and 20 % RH where participants remained seated at rest for 2 hr·day −1 with their rectal temperature maintained between 38.5 – 39.0°C. A two‐way repeated measures ANOVA with factors of Acclimation State (Pre and Post) and delta T ES (0 to 1.4°C above rest) was employed with post hoc analysis completed with two‐tailed, paired t‐tests. The significance level was p<0.05. Results HA was confirmed by a significant decrease in resting esophageal temperature (T ES ) from 37.60 ± 0.19 (mean ± SD) to 37.31 ± 0.11°C (p=0.001). During the 40°C immersions significant decreases in the T ES thresholds for temple cutaneous blood velocity from 37.34 ± 0.12 to 37.14 ± 0.16°C (p=0.008) and for forehead eccrine sweating from 37.61 ± 0.21 to 37.24 ± 0.24°C (p=0.007) also confirmed heat acclimation. HA did not influence oxygen consumption from 0.21 ± 0.07 to 0.22 ± 0.07 L/min (p=0.15). Carbohydrate oxidation rate increased from 0.21 ± 0.21 to 0.28 ± 0.26 g·min −1 (p=0.002). Lipid oxidation rate decreased from 1.16 ± 0.22 to 1.09 ± 0.24 g·min −1 (p<0.001). Conclusion Following a passive heat acclimation the evidence reports no change in oxygen consumption, and contrary to that hypothesized, there was a decrease in lipid oxidation rate and an increase in carbohydrate oxidation rate. Support or Funding Information Funding Source This project was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canada Foundation for Innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207