MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016344222 · doi:10.1785/0220200112

Preface to the Focus Section on Historical Seismograms

2020· article· en· W3016344222 on OpenAlexaffabout
A L Bent, Diane I. Doser, Lorraine Hwang

Bibliographic record

VenueSeismological Research Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSection (typography)SeismogramGeologySeismologyFocus (optics)Computer scienceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| April 15, 2020 Preface to the Focus Section on Historical Seismograms Allison L. Bent; Allison L. Bent * 1Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada *Corresponding author: allison.bent@canada.ca Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Diane I. Doser; Diane I. Doser 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas, U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Lorraine J. Hwang Lorraine J. Hwang 3University of California, Davis, Davis, California, U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Seismological Research Letters (2020) 91 (3): 1356–1358. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200112 Article history first online: 15 Apr 2020 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Allison L. Bent, Diane I. Doser, Lorraine J. Hwang; Preface to the Focus Section on Historical Seismograms. Seismological Research Letters 2020;; 91 (3): 1356–1358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220200112 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search Seismology is now in an era where high‐quality digital recordings are abundant and easily accessed. The digital era, however, encompasses only a small fraction of recorded seismic history. The predigital era with recordings on paper, tape, and other media covers a much longer time period. Data collected during this time are important not only in the study of earthquakes and related phenomena but also under new paradigms. Synthesizing data and information from the predigital era with modern data and analysis techniques presents new opportunities for discovery and learning. However, these predigital seismograms, which comprise a vast, largely undertapped data source,... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeismological Research LettersSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207