MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016349309 · doi:10.1002/cncr.32883

Pembrolizumab for the treatment of programmed death–ligand 1‒positive advanced carcinoid or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Results from the KEYNOTE‐028 study

2020· article· en· W3016349309 on OpenAlexaff
Janice M. Mehnert, Emily Bergsland, Bert H. O’Neil, Armando Santoro, Jan H.M. Schellens, Roger B. Cohen, Toshihiko Doi, Patrick A. Ott, Michael J. Pishvaian, Igor Puzanov, Kyaw Aung, Chiun Hsu, Christophe Le Tourneau, Antoine Hollebecque, Elena Élez, Kenji Tamura, M. Gould, Ping Yang, Karen Stein, Sarina A. Piha‐Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersPharmacyclicsChugai PharmaceuticalMerck Sharp and DohmeEMD SeronoGenentechBavarian NordicSirtex MedicalFibroGenEisaiCelgeneRakuten MedicalAminex TherapeuticsPfizerIncyteIpsenFive Prime TherapeuticsLes Laboratories Pierre FabreMacroGenicsCelldex TherapeuticsPrincipia BiopharmaPuma BiotechnologyNational Institutes of HealthRegeneron PharmaceuticalsBioMarin PharmaceuticalDaiichi Sankyo EuropeNational Cancer InstituteServierGilead SciencesAlexion PharmaceuticalsHalozymeKyowa Hakko KirinSanofiGlaxoSmithKlineAmgenAstraZenecaEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabCohortInternal medicineNeuroendocrine tumorsClinical endpointGastroenterologyResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsOncologyProgressive diseaseImmunotherapyCancerDiseaseClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite a protracted disease course and multiple available therapies, patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) inevitably experience disease progression. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been associated with NET progression and prognosis. The multicohort, phase 1 KEYNOTE-028 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02054806) evaluated the activity and safety of the anti-programmed cell death protein 1 immunotherapy pembrolizumab in patients with well-differentiated or moderately-differentiated NETs. METHODS: Patients with PD-L1-positive, locally advanced or metastatic carcinoid or well-differentiated or moderately-differentiated pancreatic NETs (pNETs) were enrolled into separate cohorts and received pembrolizumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks for up to 2 years. The objective response rate was the primary endpoint (as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, by investigator review). Safety was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 170 and 106 patients, respectively, who had evaluable samples among those screened for the carcinoid and pNET cohorts, 21% and 25%, respectively, had PD-L1-positive tumors; of these, 25 and 16 patients, respectively, were eligible and treated. The median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-35 months) and 21 months (range, 5-32 months), respectively. The objective response rate was 12.0% (95% CI, 2.5%-31.2%) and 6.3% (95% CI, 0.2%-30.2%), respectively; 3 partial responses occurred among the carcinoid cohort and 1 among the pNET cohort. The median duration of response in the carcinoid cohort was 9.2 months (range, 6.9-11.1 months), and was not reached in the pNET cohort. No complete responses occurred. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 68% and 69% of patients, respectively, most often diarrhea (7 patients in the carcinoid cohort and 4 patients in the pNET cohort) and fatigue (6 patients in each cohort). Hypothyroidism was the most common immune-mediated adverse event (5 patients in the carcinoid cohort and 2 patients in the pNET cohort). CONCLUSIONS: Pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity in a subset of patients with NETs and was well-tolerated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations150
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207