MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cerebral erythropoietin increases the hippocampal mitochondrial respiration during the postnatal development

2020· article· en· W3016366476 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jorge Soliz, Christian Arias‐Reyes, Sofien Laouafs, Robert A. Jacobs, Edith M. Schneider Gasser

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMitochondrionBioenergeticsHippocampal formationNeurogenesisCell biologyHippocampusBiologyOxidative stressErythropoietinOxidative phosphorylationRespirationReactive oxygen speciesNeuroscienceEndocrinologyBiochemistryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mitochondrial respiration is the metabolic process in which ATP is formed as a result of electron transfer and substrate oxidation. However, in addition to this classic role, mitochondrial respiration, and the concomitant production of ROS, are also required to maintain ionic cell membrane gradients, develop synaptic pruning (axonal and dendritic growth), provide effective neurotransmission, modulate signaling pathways and regulate neurogenesis and differentiation. While all these processes occur during brain development, little is known about the regulation of mitochondrial respiration in the postnatal development of hippocampal tissue. In parallel, studies conducted over the past two decades demonstrated that cerebral erythropoietin (Epo) plays a crucial role in the development of the nervous system. Remarkably, Epo‐mediated neurodevelopment requires the activation of molecular mechanisms that are tightly associated with mitochondrial functions. Inline, recent published literature demonstrated that Epo modulates mitochondrial bioenergetics and control of oxidative stress in several tissues, including the brain. In this work, we evaluated the impact of Epo in the regulation of hippocampal mitochondrial respiration of mice during postnatal development. To do so, the hippocampus of wild type (WT) and transgenic mice constitutively overexpressing Epo in the brain only (Tg21) at postnatal ages 3 (P3), 7 (P7), 14 (P14), and 21 (P21) was collected. Mitochondrial oxygen consumption was measured by using our oxygraph‐2K system (O2k‐OROBOROS). Recording of the mitochondrial oxygen consumption was evaluated in 2 mg of tissue permeabilized with saponin, after the activation of complexes I (CI), I+II (C I+II), and IV (CIV). Our results showed that at P14 and P21, Epo in hippocampal tissue: 1) increases the mitochondrial respiratory activity; 2) increases the mitochondrial respiratory capacity; 3) maximizes the respiratory efficiency; and 4) augments the number mitochondria per tissue. Additional analysis, performed by using colorimetric assay kits, revealed that Epo at P14 increases the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD). Altogether, our results suggest that Epo promotes an increased oxidative metabolism in the hippocampus at an age when this structure undergoes a full process of development and maturation. Support or Funding Information Jorge Soliz is supported by the “Fonds de recherche du Quebec‐Santé” (FRQ‐S; FQ121919)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicErythropoietin and Anemia TreatmentFrench-language works237,207