MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Mode Transfer on a Compact Silicon Chip by Encircling Moving Exceptional Points

2020· article· en· W3016385207 on OpenAlexaff
Qingjie Liu, Shuyi Li, Bing Wang, Shaolin Ke, Chengzhi Qin, Kai Wang, Weiwei Liu, Dingshan Gao, Pierre Berini, Peixiang Lu

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Postdoctoral Program for Innovative TalentsNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSilicon chipSiliconChipMode (computer interface)Transfer (computing)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsPhysicsComputer scienceParallel computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exceptional points (EPs) are branch point singularities of self-intersecting Riemann sheets, and they can be observed in a non-Hermitian system with complex eigenvalues. It has been revealed recently that dynamically encircling EPs by adiabatically changing the parameters of a system composed of lossy optical waveguides could lead to asymmetric (input-output) mode transfer. However, the length of the waveguides had to be considerable to ensure adiabatic evolution. Here we demonstrate that the parameters can change adiabatically along a smaller encircling loop by utilizing moving EPs, leading to significant shortening of the structures compared to fixed EPs. Meanwhile, the mode transmittance is remarkably improved and the transfer efficiency persists at ∼90%. Moving EPs are very promising for applications such as highly integrated broadband optical switches and convertors operating at telecommunication wavelengths.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations109
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207