Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resume Savoirs creoles : Lecons du sida pour l’histoire de Montreal propose un regard critique sur l’histoire de Montreal a travers l’epidemie du sida au cours des annees 1980. Viviane Namaste etudie les differentes formes de lutte de la communaute haitienne, faussement associee au sida et par consequent victime de discriminations dans tous les domaines de la vie publique (logement, education, emploi, sante… ). A partir d’une documentation originale, de recherches dans les journaux, radios, archives et d’entrevues, Savoirs creoles montre le lien etabli par les institutions publiques entre les Haitien·ne·s et la maladie. Les membres de la communaute, ayant vecu cet amalgame tel un desastre, ont deploye des modeles de mobilisation exemplaires et des savoirs enracines dans leur vecu, leur langue et leur culture. L’auteure souligne l’immense travail des infirmieres haitiennes qui se retrouvaient au premier plan de la lutte. Analysant cette crise de sante publique, Namaste pose la question : Comment et pourquoi certaines realites sont effacees dans l’histoire de la ville de Montreal ? L’auteure Viviane Namaste est professeure titulaire a l’Institut Simone de Beauvoir, Universite Concordia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".