MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016496251 · doi:10.2217/pgs-2019-0179

Pharmacoresponse in Genetic Generalized Epilepsy: A Genome-Wide Association Study

2020· article· en· W3016496251 on OpenAlexaff
Stefan Wolking, Herbert Schulz, Anne T. Nies, Mark McCormack, Elke Schaeffeler, Pauls Auce, Andreja Avberšek, Felicitas Becker, Karl Martin Klein, Martin Krenn, Rikke S. Møller, Marina Nikanorova, Sarah Weckhuysen, EpiPGx Consortium, Gianpiero L. Cavalleri, Norman Delanty, Chantal Depondt, Michael R. Johnson, Bobby P.C. Koeleman, Wolfram S. Kunz, Anthony G Marson, Josemir W. Sander, Graeme J. Sills, Pasquale Striano, Federico Zara, Fritz Zimprich, Yvonne Weber, Roland Krause, Sanjay M. Sisodiya, Matthias Schwab, Thomas Sander, Holger Lerche

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacogenomics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean CommissionNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyLamotrigineGenetic associationSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPharmacogeneticsCandidate geneSNPEpilepsyLevetiracetamMedicineGeneticsBiologyGenotypeGenePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: Pharmacoresistance is a major burden in epilepsy treatment. We aimed to identify genetic biomarkers in response to specific antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in genetic generalized epilepsies (GGE). Materials & methods: We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of 3.3 million autosomal SNPs in 893 European subjects with GGE – responsive or nonresponsive to lamotrigine, levetiracetam and valproic acid. Results: Our GWAS of AED response revealed suggestive evidence for association at 29 genomic loci (p <10-5) but no significant association reflecting its limited power. The suggestive associations highlight candidate genes that are implicated in epileptogenesis and neurodevelopment. Conclusion: This first GWAS of AED response in GGE provides a comprehensive reference of SNP associations for hypothesis-driven candidate gene analyses in upcoming pharmacogenetic studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacogenomicsSame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207