MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3016505469 · doi:10.1016/j.str.2020.03.012

Structure of the Peptidoglycan Synthase Activator LpoP in Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2020· article· en· W3016505469 on OpenAlexaff
Nathanael A. Caveney, Alexander J. F. Egan, Isabel Ayala, Cédric Laguri, Craig S. Robb, Eefjan Breukink, Waldemar Vollmer, N.C.J. Strynadka, Jean‐Pierre Simorre

Bibliographic record

VenueStructure · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicEnzyme Structure and Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersOffice of ScienceAgence Nationale de la RechercheWellcome Trust
KeywordsPeptidoglycanPseudomonas aeruginosaActivator (genetics)ATP synthaseMicrobiologyChemistryBiochemistryEnzymeBiologyBacteriaReceptorGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peptidoglycan (PG) is an essential component of the bacterial cell wall and is assembled from a lipid II precursor by glycosyltransferase and transpeptidase reactions catalyzed in particular by bifunctional class A penicillin-binding proteins (aPBPs). In the major clinical pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PBP1B is anchored within the cytoplasmic membrane but regulated by a bespoke outer membrane-localized lipoprotein known as LpoP. Here, we report the structure of LpoP, showing an extended N-terminal, flexible tether followed by a well-ordered C-terminal tandem-tetratricopeptide repeat domain. We show that LpoP stimulates both PBP1B transpeptidase and glycosyltransferase activities in vitro and interacts directly via its C terminus globular domain with the central UB2H domain of PBP1B. Contrary to the situation in E. coli, P. aeruginosa CpoB does not regulate PBP1B/LpoP in vitro. We propose a mechanism that helps to underscore similarities and differences in class A PBP activation across Gram-negative bacteria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructureSame topicEnzyme Structure and FunctionFrench-language works237,207