Complexity of the eukaryotic dolichol-linked oligosaccharide scramblase suggested by activity correlation profiling mass spectrometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The canonical pathway of N -linked protein glycosylation in yeast and humans involves transfer of the oligosaccharide moiety from the glycolipid Glc 3 Man 9 GlcNAc 2 -PP-dolichol to select asparagine residues in proteins that have been translocated into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Synthesis of Glc 3 Man 9 GlcNAc 2 -PP-dolichol occurs in two stages, producing first the key intermediate Man 5 GlcNAc 2 -PP-dolichol (M5-DLO) on the cytoplasmic face of the ER, followed by translocation of M5-DLO across the ER membrane to the luminal leaflet where the remaining glycosyltransfer reactions occur to complete the structure. Despite its critical importance for N -glycosylation, the scramblase protein that mediates the translocation of M5-DLO across the ER membrane has not been identified. Building on our ability to recapitulate scramblase activity in large unilamellar proteoliposomes reconstituted with a crude mixture of ER membrane proteins, we developed a mass spectrometry-based ‘activity correlation profiling’ approach to identify scramblase candidates in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Curation of the activity correlation profiling data prioritized six polytopic ER membrane proteins as scramblase candidates, but reconstitution-based assays and gene disruption in the protist Trypanosoma brucei revealed, unexpectedly, that none of these proteins were necessary for M5-DLO scramblase activity. Our results instead suggest the possibility that the M5-DLO scramblase may be a protein, or protein complex, whose activity is regulated at the level of quaternary structure. This key insight will aid future attempts to identify the scramblase.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".