MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Severity of Central Sleep Apnea Does Not Improve Sleeping Oxygen Saturation During Ascent to High Altitude

2020· article· en· W3016551385 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jordan D. Bird, Anne Kalker, Jason Chan, Alexander Rimke, Garrick Chan, Richard J. A. Wilson, Tom D. Brutsaert, Nicholas Jendzjowsky, Mingma G. Sherpa, Trevor A. Day

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHyperventilationHypocapniaEffects of high altitude on humansHypoxia (environmental)MedicinePeriodic breathingApneaHypoxic ventilatory responseAnesthesiaCentral sleep apneaAcclimatizationOxygen saturationAltitude (triangle)Obstructive sleep apneaNadirOxygenCardiologyInternal medicinePolysomnographyRespiratory systemChemistryBiologyHypercapniaAcidosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is characterized by intermittent periods of apnea (no breathing) and hyperventilation (over breathing) with associated fluctuations in blood oxygen saturation. CSA is universal at high altitude (>3000m), increasing in severity with ascent and/or time spent at high altitude. Although there is a large degree of variability in CSA severity, factors that increase susceptibility to CSA at altitude include: (a) hypoxia, (b) hypoxic ventilatory response‐mediated hypocapnia and (c) increases in chemoreflex responsiveness via ventilatory acclimatization. Whether CSA is adaptive or maladaptive at altitude is unknown. Notwithstanding the brief periods of desaturation associated with apnea, the subsequent relative intermittent hyperventilation may increase oxygen reserves during sleep, protecting overall mean saturation. We hypothesized that CSA protects mean sleeping oxygen saturation during acclimatization to high altitude. In two groups of Diamox‐free native lowlanders, we characterized the effects of increasing CSA severity on night‐time sleeping oxygen saturation during two separate high altitude ascent profiles: (I) incremental ascent to 5160m over 10 days/nights in the Nepal Himalaya (n=21) and (II) rapid ascent to and residing at 3800m over 10 days/nights in the Sierra Nevada mountains, CA, USA (n=21). Using portable polysomnographs and scoring software (ResMed ApneaLink; AASM criteria), we assessed apnea‐hypopnea index (AHI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), and baseline, mean and nadir oxygen saturation (SpO2) during sleep at each altitude. During sleep across both ascent profiles, AHI and ODI increased in severity, and baseline, mean and nadir SpO2 decreased significantly, suggesting both altitude‐ and sleep apnea‐associated hypoxia. During incremental ascent to 5160m over 10 days/nights (Part I), AHI and ODI increased from 3.9±4.1 and 9.8±7.8 (1045m) to 37.5±32.8 and 54.4±24.8 events/hour, respectively (P<0.001). In addition, baseline, mean and nadir SpO2 decreased from 96.0±2.0, 94.3±1.6 and 87.1±3.7% (1045m) to 78.9±3.6, 73.5±4.2 and 63.7±6.6%, respectively (P<0.0001). After 10 days/nights following rapid ascent to 3800m (Part II), AHI and ODI increased from 3.4±3.5 and 6.8±5.3 (1045m) to 23.2±21.2 and 38.0±24.4 events/hour, respectively (P<0.001). In addition, baseline, mean and nadir SpO2 decreased from 95.3±1.9, 93.7±2.1 and 86.0±5.1% (1045m) to 85.6±1.8, 84.0±2.4 and 74.1±6.2%, respectively (P<0.0001). There were no significant correlations between AHI nor ODI and mean nor nadir SpO2 during sleep at 5160m (night 9/10; Part I; r>−0.35, P>0.2) and 3800m (night 9/10; Part II; r>−0.45, P>0.05). We conclude that the severity of CSA following acclimatization to high altitude does not play a role in improving oxygen saturation. However, the relative hyperventilation between apneas likely protects against the apnea‐mediated oxygen desaturations during sleep at altitude. Support or Funding Information Alberta Government Student Temporary Employment Program, Alberta Innovates Health Solutions, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207