Grey Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Methods Based on Interval Grey Triangular Fuzzy Numbers Partitioned Bonferroni Mean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considering the characteristics such as fuzziness and greyness in real decision-making, the interval grey triangular fuzzy number is easy to express fuzzy and grey information simultaneously. And the partition Bonferroni mean (PBM) operator has the ability to calculate the interrelationship among the attributes. In this study, we combine the PBM operator into the interval grey triangular fuzzy numbers to increase the applicable scope of PBM operators. First of all, we introduced the definition, properties, expectation, and distance of the interval grey triangular fuzzy numbers, and then we proposed the interval grey triangular fuzzy numbers partitioned Bonferroni mean (IGTFPBM) and the interval grey triangular fuzzy numbers weighted partitioned Bonferroni mean (IGTFWPBM), the adjusting of parameters in the operator can bring symmetry effect to the evaluation results. After that, a novel method based on IGTFWPBM is developed for solving the grey fuzzy multiple attribute group decision-making (GFMAGDM) problems. Finally, we give an example to expound the practicability and superiority of this method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.067 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".